新潮の誤報の件だが、、、、、、、

計算は　calculation
はっきりとは　clearly
超過は　excess
本物の　genuine
借りとなっている　owing
可能な　possible
閉じる　shut
引っ込める　withdraw
虚偽　falsehood
禁じられた　forbidden

The Asahi Shimbun Hanshin branch was attacked in 1987 and "Weekly Shincho" that serialized the confession note of the man who introduced himself "Direct perpetrator" admitted that the content was a mistake because of the issue on 23 days April of the sale of the 16th concerning the event etc. to whom two journalists were killed and injured. Details of publishing are made public over page 10, and it apologizes. It is extremely exceptional that the weekly magazine voluntarily denies the content of the crusading journalism. Editor in chief Kiyoshi Hayakawa assumes, "It is thought that the accountability was accomplished to the reader", and denies cover suspending publication and the discontinuance. The editor in chief alternates from the title one after another.

Article..weekly..Shincho..thus..direct perpetrator..deception..cheat..)..do..entitle..Hayakawa..editor in chief..signature..publish.The texts are about 16,500 characters of as many as the manuscript 400 letter packing about 41 form. Man..suddenly..direct perpetrator..testimony..overturn..do..note..false report..avow..put..boil..do..assume.

As for the cause of becoming a false report, it is "Needless to say, it is dissatisfied of the proof coverage. " ..certain... On that｢Lie..testimony..person..essence..see through..insight..provide..deep..deeply ashamed.Having damaged trust in the magazine journalism doesn't bear shame. ｣It recorded.

The communication started from man's writing the letter in November, '07 from the prison under the penal servitude addressed to the Shincho company, and it was spoken that it was an interview in January last year and a direct perpetrator according to the article. After release, the man did the communication repeatedly for about 200 hours on January 4 this year.

The verification article to which "Lie" of Asahi Shimbun was a note is published on February 23 after the serial ends. Still, it is still convinced that the man's testimony is correct at that time. It is said that it had not corrected it because it was not to the positive proof "The core part of the event is wrong" though a mysterious point began to appear in man's career in the pursuit coverage afterwards.

The editor in chief of Hayakawa explains on the 15th, "It was considerably thought that it was a real thing though it was not thought it was 100% correct" the coverage of Kyodo News Service. Coverage was advanced to sectional by four person situation like being strictly confidential including the editor in chief to prevent the information leakage, and it was assumed that it was one of the factors that few of the number of people becomes proof shortage. Moreover, the reason to believe the man's testimony｢The talk was and there was a reality in detail. Certainty evidence of wrong was not enumerated rather than judging it was positively correct. ｣｢It has laid weight too much in the testimony by the real name. The demand of money is not, and is not thought to be a publicity stunt. ｣With the explanation. This serial ..[**] (.. was emphasized to go to sleep and not to hit) make article. It is assumed, "It is thought that the accountability was accomplished" by the sale title on the 16th, and denies the discontinuance and suspending publication. The intention that research committee's installation and result of the survey did not make public was shown.